top of page

Multi-Omics Atlas-Assisted Discovery of Transcription Factors for Selective T Cell State Programming

23 okt. 2024

Kay-Chung et al. (BioRxiv) 

DOI:10.1101/2023.01.03.522354

Keywords

  • CD8+ T cells

  • Transcription factors

  • Tumor immunology


Main Findings

The location and cues from the  local microenvironment influence the differentiation state of T cells,  resulting in a diverse array of functionality. Transcription factors  (TF) control the differentiation of cells and understanding how and  which TFs govern CD8+T cell differentiation can improve the outcome of  CD8+ T cell-based therapies and help to uncover novel biology behind  fundamental processes.

Chung et al (not peer reviewed) have generated a transcriptional atlas of CD8+T  cell differentiation states by integrating transcriptomic and epigenomic  data. This effort led to the identification of TFs that are associated  with single-state-specific TFs and multi-state TFs that regulate more  than one state. Their pipeline recapitulated some known TFs (e.g. TCF-1)  but excitingly, revealed novel and previously unreported TFs (e.g.  Jdp2, Zscan20, Zlp324 for terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells (TEXterm)).

As a proof-of-concept  validation, the authors depleted the TFs predicted to be associated with  TEXterm cells by introducing gRNA libraries to Cas9+ P14 donor T cells.  These cells were adoptively transferred to mice infected with  LCMV-Clone 13 and the authors assessed the differentiation of  transferred cells to various CD8+T cell states. Depletion of novel TFs  reduced the frequency of TEXterm cell frequency and expression of  inhibitory receptors. Moreover, effector functions of CD8+T cells (e.g.  frequency of IFNg+ TNFa+ P14 cells) and anti-viral responses have  improved.

Similarly, the authors utilized  B16-GP33 syngeneic tumor model to test if disrupting predicted  TEXterm-specific TFs can enhance tumor control. Mice with established  B16-GP33 tumors were adoptively transferred with Cas9+ P14 cells that  were transduced with gRNAs against TFs predicted to be associated with  TEXterm cells (e.g. Zscan20 and Zfp324). Depletion of TEXterm specific  TFs improved tumor control, the transferred cells expressed effector  markers more, and the transferred cells committed to progenitor state  more than terminally exhausted state. Finally, anti-PD-1 treatment  synergized with depletion of TEXterm-specific TFs and resulted in better  tumor control than either treatment alone.

Overall, this study presents a  framework to systematically identify novel TFs that drive various CD8+ T  cell states and experimentally validates several of these TFs that are  involved in TEXterm differentiation. With the growing sequencing  datasets, similar frameworks can be for other cell types and/or disease  states and improve our knowledge on transcriptional networks in immune  cells.


Limitations

  • CRISPR may result in unwanted gene edits, alternative methods to modulate the TF activity would be helpful.

  • Human  validation – either from TILs or chronic infections. Would modulating  these TFs have a function in human CD8+T cell phenotypes?

  • Human  diseases develop in years, however the models used in this study are in  weeks – what are the long-term effects of TF manipulation on T cell  function? Do cells adapt to lack of these TFs?


Significance/Novelty

This study delineates the TF  networks in different T cell states. With extensive validation of novel  TFs, their observations can lead to more discoveries in T cells to  enhance T-cell based therapies for cancer. Given the demonstration of  the predictive power of this framework, this idea can be expanded to  other cells/disease states.


Recommendations

  • This  study predicts various novel candidates and validates some – how are  these TFs regulated, which signaling pathways result in the activation  of these TFs?

  • Combinatorial  modulation? Can the anti-tumor activity improve if two or more TFs are  depleted? If so, how can one select such combinations?

  • Microenvironment that TRM develop may impact their TF landscape. How are these TFs impact TRM from different anatomical sites?

  • Safety and efficacy of TF-modified T cells as therapeutics?

  • There  are other TF-activity prediction algorithms - comparing the results and  looking for consensus TFs may result in higher confidence predictions.


Credit

Reviewed by Didem Ağaç Çobanoğlu as part of a cross-institutional journal club between the Icahn School  of Medicine at Mount Sinai, the University of Oxford, the Karolinska  Institute, the University of Toronto and MD Anderson Cancer Center.


The author declares no conflict of interests in relation to their involvement in the review.

bottom of page