top of page

IL-10 Targets IRFs to Suppress IFN and Inflammatory Response Genes by Epigenetic Mechanisms

17 jan. 2025

Bikash Mishra et al. (BioRxiv) 

DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.07.622491

Keywords

  • IL-10 mediated suppression

  • LPS induced inflammation

  • Human monocytes


Main Findings

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a  well-recognized immuno-suppressing cytokine, which has been described to  inhibit induction of inflammatory cytokines encoded by NF-κB target  genes (e.g. TNF, IL6, IL1B and IL12B)  in myeloid cells like monocytes and macrophages, as well as dendritic  cells. After binding to the IL-10 receptor, the downstream signalling  pathway is mediated by the transcription factor STAT3. However, since  STAT3 does not directly suppress the targeted inflammatory genes, the  exact mechanisms of IL-10 mediated immune-suppression are not clearly  understood.

In this preprint, the authors  focus on the effects of IL-10 mediated suppression of LPS- induced  inflammation in human monocytes. In the main experiments, human blood  monocytes are incubated in vitro  with IL-10 for 18 hours prior to LPS-stimulation for 3 hours. Another  setup also investigates the effects of the 18-hour IL-10 preincubation  on subsequent stimulation with TNF (for 6h hours). The effects of IL-10  mediated suppression are analysed on a transcriptomic and epigenetic  level by different methods such as RNAseq, ATACseq and CUT&RUN  sequencing.
Interestingly, the authors find that rather than suppressing NF-kB and  MAPK signalling, IL-10 targets Interferon regulatory factors IRF1 and  IRF5 and their DNA binding/transcription factor activity, which further  leads to a near-complete suppression of Interferon stimulated genes  (ISGs), more than inflammatory genes. These changes are mediated by  epigenetic mechanisms such as reduction of chromatin accessibility and  de-novo enhancer formation, as well as reduction of IRF1-associated  H3K27ac activating histone marks at both ISG and inflammatory gene loci.  Similar results to LPS stimulated monocytes were also found in TNF  stimulation. Therefore, this study discovered a novel mechanism of IL-10  mediated suppression of inflammatory gene responses after LPS and TNF  stimulation in human blood monocytes.


Limitations & Suggestions

  • Clarification and rationale of IL-10 incubation times and setting.
    This study shows that incubation of IL-10 prior to LPS  stimulation leads to downregulation of interferon and inflammatory  pathways in an in-vitro model  using human monocytes. However, it is not fully clear, why specific  protocols or stimulation times were chosen (e.g. IL-10 incubation period  of 18 hours, 3 hours of LPS treatment, 6 hours of TNF treatment). Since  LPS can even induce IL-10, a physiologically more likely setting seems  to be that monocytes get in contact with LPS and then stimulated by  IL-10. Also, it would be very interesting to understand, how the authors  chose the used timepoint of 3 hours post LPS stimulation. Suggestion: Maybe there is already available data from dose testing experiments and  different time points of pre-treatment or stimulation, that would be  very interesting to include in the study. Otherwise, literature  indicating similar protocols could be cited more extensively to increase  the understanding of the reader.

  • Applicability of the findings to other stimuli.  The  authors mainly used LPS stimulation to investigate IL-10 suppression on  TLR4 induced inflammation and TNF stimulation to underline their  findings in a MAPK/ NF-κB inducing stimulus, however it would be  interesting to understand if their findings are specific to these  pathways or also hold true other stimulations, especially considering  that ISGs can be induced by a plethora of stimuli. Suggestion: Using other  stimuli (e.g. INFγ, but also different TLR ligands) after IL-10  incubation would help to get more insight on the pathways described by  the authors.

  • Mechanism and downstream pathway of IL-10 mediated suppression. While  the authors find epigenetic alternations and IRF1/IRF5 mediated effects  as crucial for IL-10 mediated suppression of inflammatory responses,  the exact mechanism downstream of IL-10 receptor binding remains  unclear. How does IL-10 lead to these epigenetic changes? The authors  mention metabolic reprogramming as a potential mechanism in their  introduction, but this is not investigated further. Suggestion: Metabolomics of the IL-10 suppressed monocytes or other metabolic  readouts would be very interesting to investigate the impact of  metabolic epigenetic reprogramming. Furthermore, the authors could  speculate about other potential mechanisms in their discussion and maybe  try out methods such as co-immunoprecipitation of the IRFs with or  without IL-10 incubation to identify associated proteins that are  modulated by IL-10 treatment.

  • Investigation of findings in a relevant perturbed setting. The  primary human monocytes that are investigated in this study are derived  from healthy subjects. Interestingly, as the authors state in their  discussion, elevated IRF1 levels have been found in different autoimmune  diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus,  diseases which can also be accompanied by IL-10 deficiency. Furthermore,  IL-10 production is also dysregulated in aging and has been proposed to  be important for limiting age associated increased inflammatory effects  (“inflammaging”). While the effects of age of the healthy donors is not  mentioned in this study, it would be very relevant to further  investigate if the study´s findings are changed in older monocytes. Suggestion: While this might be not feasible to include in the same study,  monocytes from patients with the stated diseases or patients of  different age groups could be compared for chromatin alternation and  transcriptional changes upon IL-10 induction, as this would also link  the findings to a more clinically relevant setting.

  • Minor inconsistencies. There  is a “with” missing in row 199 (“associated with decreased…”);  Fig.  4f: The labelling of the IGF gene tracks is not fully aligned and makes  this figure hard to understand/decipher. Also, the last line (IL10+LPS)  appears to be cut off; Extended data Fig 1g: In the TNF model  experimental setup, the labelling of the TNF only groups still has an  LPS written next to it, which should be exchanged to TNF.


Significance/Novelty

In this preprint, the authors  used various innovative methods such as RNAseq, ATACseq and CUT&  RUNseq to show compelling and well-presented evidence that IL-10 leads  to changes chromatin accessibility and downregulation of interferon  responses by suppressing IRF1 and IRF5-induction, while the  Nf-κB-mediated inflammatory response is mainly not targeted by IL-10.  While this is novel and impressive data, the exact mechanisms of IL-10  mediated suppression are not fully clear from this study.
The authors investigate human blood monocytes, which play an important  role in a variety of diseases, so more knowledge on their activation and  regulation is key for understanding the pathologies in which they are  involved. However, the setup used by the study is not physiologically  relevant, so further studies with different stimuli and different  conditions are needed to fully understand the relevance of the results.


Credit

Reviewed by Martin Murauer and Lisabeth Pimenov as part of a cross-institutional journal club between the Max-Delbrück  Center Berlin, the Ragon Institute Boston (Mass General, MIT, Harvard),  the Medical University of Vienna and other life science institutes in  Vienna.


The authors declare no conflict of interests in relation to their involvement in the review.

bottom of page