top of page

Memory-Phenotype Ly49+ CD8 T emerging from the thymus develop into two subsets with distinct immune functions

31 jan. 2025

Laubreton et al. (BioRxiv) 

DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.10.627689

Keywords

  • Memory-Phenotype

  • Ly49+ CD8 T Cells

  • Thymic Development

  • Lineage Tracing

  • Bystander Signaling


Main Findings

Ly49+ CD8 T cells represent a  subset of memory-phenotype (MP) cells and despite being antigen  inexperienced, express memory markers such as CD44 and CD122. These  cells, which are the murine equivalent of human killer cell  immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR)+ CD8 T cells, play a pivotal role in  mitigating autoimmune diseases and are considered part of the larger and  still somewhat disputed CD8 regulatory T cell (Treg) subgroup.  Nevertheless, the mechanisms driving their differentiation and  functional role remain elusive.

In this preprint (not peer  reviewed), Laubreton et al. characterize two distinct subsets of Ly49+  CD8 T cells based on the expression of coreceptor CD8β (CD8αα v. CD8αβ)  as well as the Ikaros transcription factor family member, Helios. These  results extend to the KIR+ CD8 T cell population, establishing diversity  within this cell group.

Unlike conventional T cell  precursor thymocytes, a significant portion of CD4/CD8 double negative  (DN) Ly49+ thymocytes express T cell receptor (TCR)-β. Much akin to  precursors of other unconventional T cell types, such as natural killer T  (NKT), mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT), and intraepithelial  lymphocytes (IELs), Ly49+ thymocytes are suggested to undergo an  alternative thymic selection process, termed agonist selection, whereby  strong and sustained TCR signaling is essential for their development.  Utilizing multiparametric flow cytometry along with pseudotime ordering,  the scientists perform in silico lineage tracing. Per their results,  Ly49+ thymocytes appear to progress to a DN stage post the double  positive (DP) stage, resulting in two distinct subsets of mature Ly49+  CD8 single positive (SP) T cells. Eomes expression, which is crucial in  regulating T cell development, seems to drive the development of these  Ly49+ T cells. Leaning on the lab’s previous research, the scientists  observe significant reduction in the number and overall percentage of  Ly49+ CD8 T cells in a Zeb1 transcription factor knockout mouse model,  hinting at the role Zeb1 plays in enabling Ly49+ thymocytes escaping  negative selection.

Using a vaccinia virus model,  the scientists reveal that a small fraction of these cells, especially  the CD8αβ subset, acquires an antigen specific effector profile  (characterized by type II interferon production) and contribute to the  antiviral response. Incorporating single cell RNA sequencing, Laubreton  et al. home in on the downregulation of immediate early genes (IEGs)  such as Fos and Jun within Ly49+ CD8 T cells in the infected model when  compared to cells from a wildtype control, leading them to explore the  effects of activation without TCR signaling, termed bystander  activation. Induction of chemokine receptor CXCR5 post interleukin  (IL)-12/IL-18 stimulation would allow for germinal center recruitment of  Ly49+ CD8 T cells, further reinforcing the idea of their role in  controlling autoimmunity development post-infections.


Limitations

The authors did a wonderful job  assessing the development of these MP cells. However, a few follow-up  experiments could help augment their findings.

In the process of performing  high parameter flow cytometry and using Slingshot for trajectory  inference, concurrently performing an actual tracing study could be very  beneficial and validate the suggestive data. Performing an adoptive  transfer of labeled MP precursor cells could help confirm the final  phenotype of the thymic precursors which give rise to MP cells as well  as the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) subpopulation mentioned in the  manuscript. Expanding the flow panel and evaluating various integrin  proteins expressed on the MP cells could also be beneficial.

In addition, the authors did a  good job at differentiating the two MP cell subsets based on CD8β  coreceptor and Helios transcription factor expression. Considering a  follow-up experiment incorporating TCR sequencing could also help shed  light on MP cell population differences and better assess their  diversity.

Although the incorporation of  the WT C57B/6 mouse made sense given the background of the Cellophane  mouse used (and likely the availability of the tetramer haplotypes used  in the vaccinia virus experiments), the inclusion of a Balb/c mouse  could help elevate the findings. According to literature, Balb/c mice  not only have more, but also a distinct, Ly49 protein family expression  when compared to C57B/6 mice.

The expression of FcεR1γ in the  CD8αα Ly49+ CD8 T cells was also quite intriguing. Different subsets of T  cells can express low levels of Fc receptors, and we suggest exploring  this further as IgE antibodies often play a role in allergic immune  reactions, hinting at a potential new role for the CD8αα MP cells.

Lastly, although the goal of the  paper was to determine the developmental pathway of the cells,  performing an inhibition assay, showing the impact of these MP cells on  follicular helper T (Tfh) cells post-reaching the germinal centers (post  CXCR5 induction via bystander signaling) would be stellar.


Significance/Novelty

Overall, this study sheds light  on the developmental trajectory of MP Ly49+CD8+ T cells, highlighting  the contribution of specific transcription factors, and indicates a  potential role for agonist selection and cytokine-driven bystander  signaling in their differentiation and recruitment, respectively.  Although additional experiments could help elevate the current findings,  elucidating the nature of this understudied T cell subset, by showing  parallels in their development with other unconventional T cell types as  well as their enhanced sensitivity to bystander stimulation, helps us  better appreciate their regulatory activity and role in mitigating  autoimmunity.


Credit

Reviewed by Guillaume Trusz as part of a cross-institutional journal club between the University of  Oxford, the Karolinska Institute, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount  Sinai, the University of Toronto, and the University of Texas at MD  Anderson Cancer Center


The author declares no conflict of interests in relation to their involvement in the review.

bottom of page